College Football 6-Point Teaser Table
Posted by Jimmy Boyd - Google+
Teasers are becoming more an more popular among college football bettors, so I took a deeper look at what the best lines are to tease up or down. I looked at every situation, teams as home favorites, road favorites, home underdogs, and road underdogs. Then I found out how many times a six point tease would have resulted in a win (or push), then took the cover rate and compared it to the winning percentage needed to profit on a two-team six-point teaser. In most cases you can get +100 “juice”, meaning you would need to hit at least 70.71% of your teases in order to profit. I’ve highlighted the situations below that hit at that number or better.
|
6 Point Teasers: Home Favorites
|
||||
|
Line
|
Games
|
6 Point Covers
|
6 Point Pushes
|
Cover Rate
|
|
0
|
94
|
60
|
3
|
62.64%
|
|
-1
|
277
|
190
|
11
|
67.29%
|
|
-1.5
|
181
|
121
|
0
|
66.85%
|
|
-2
|
234
|
163
|
6
|
68.86%
|
|
-2.5
|
312
|
197
|
0
|
63.14%
|
|
-3
|
434
|
289
|
19
|
65.06%
|
|
-3.5
|
356
|
244
|
0
|
68.54%
|
|
-4
|
279
|
171
|
5
|
60.58%
|
|
-4.5
|
216
|
135
|
0
|
62.50%
|
|
-5
|
215
|
139
|
4
|
63.98%
|
|
-5.5
|
213
|
151
|
0
|
70.89%
|
|
-6
|
294
|
200
|
1
|
67.92%
|
|
-6.5
|
346
|
221
|
0
|
63.87%
|
|
-7
|
459
|
318
|
8
|
68.74%
|
|
-7.5
|
268
|
191
|
0
|
71.27%
|
|
-8
|
249
|
178
|
5
|
70.90%
|
|
-8.5
|
188
|
124
|
0
|
65.96%
|
|
-9
|
233
|
162
|
15
|
67.43%
|
|
-9.5
|
178
|
119
|
0
|
66.85%
|
|
-10
|
303
|
203
|
6
|
66.33%
|
|
-10.5
|
198
|
117
|
0
|
59.09%
|
|
-11
|
206
|
131
|
3
|
63.05%
|
|
-11.5
|
131
|
79
|
0
|
60.31%
|
|
-12
|
194
|
111
|
6
|
55.85%
|
|
-12.5
|
174
|
114
|
0
|
65.52%
|
|
-13
|
263
|
165
|
9
|
61.42%
|
|
-13.5
|
231
|
155
|
0
|
67.10%
|
|
-14
|
313
|
210
|
3
|
66.77%
|
|
-14.5
|
208
|
137
|
0
|
65.87%
|
|
-15
|
194
|
116
|
5
|
58.73%
|
|
6 Point Teasers: Road Favorites
|
||||
|
Line
|
Games
|
6 Point Covers
|
6 Point Pushes
|
Cover Rate
|
|
0
|
94
|
67
|
2
|
70.65%
|
|
-1
|
278
|
186
|
7
|
66.05%
|
|
-1.5
|
176
|
121
|
0
|
68.75%
|
|
-2
|
198
|
136
|
8
|
67.37%
|
|
-2.5
|
261
|
183
|
0
|
70.11%
|
|
-3
|
372
|
244
|
20
|
63.64%
|
|
-3.5
|
307
|
197
|
0
|
64.17%
|
|
-4
|
212
|
150
|
4
|
70.19%
|
|
-4.5
|
162
|
117
|
0
|
72.22%
|
|
-5
|
173
|
115
|
7
|
65.06%
|
|
-5.5
|
176
|
106
|
0
|
60.23%
|
|
-6
|
222
|
148
|
5
|
65.90%
|
|
-6.5
|
266
|
192
|
0
|
72.18%
|
|
-7
|
313
|
221
|
13
|
69.33%
|
|
-7.5
|
194
|
133
|
0
|
68.56%
|
|
-8
|
178
|
125
|
2
|
69.89%
|
|
-8.5
|
124
|
81
|
0
|
65.32%
|
|
-9
|
119
|
79
|
8
|
63.96%
|
|
-9.5
|
114
|
79
|
0
|
69.30%
|
|
-10
|
177
|
117
|
8
|
64.50%
|
|
-10.5
|
117
|
71
|
0
|
60.68%
|
|
-11
|
126
|
84
|
4
|
65.57%
|
|
-11.5
|
72
|
46
|
0
|
63.89%
|
|
-12
|
88
|
57
|
1
|
64.37%
|
|
-12.5
|
83
|
62
|
0
|
74.70%
|
|
-13
|
124
|
66
|
7
|
50.43%
|
|
-13.5
|
116
|
67
|
0
|
57.76%
|
|
-14
|
151
|
101
|
3
|
66.22%
|
|
-14.5
|
85
|
51
|
0
|
60.00%
|
|
-15
|
80
|
51
|
0
|
63.75%
|
|
6 Point Teasers: Home Underdogs
|
||||
|
Line
|
Games
|
6 Point Covers
|
6 Point Pushes
|
Cover Rate
|
|
0
|
94
|
60
|
2
|
63.04%
|
|
-1
|
278
|
198
|
7
|
70.48%
|
|
-1.5
|
176
|
127
|
0
|
72.16%
|
|
-2
|
198
|
145
|
8
|
72.11%
|
|
-2.5
|
261
|
188
|
0
|
72.03%
|
|
-3
|
372
|
257
|
20
|
67.33%
|
|
-3.5
|
307
|
209
|
0
|
68.08%
|
|
-4
|
212
|
137
|
4
|
63.94%
|
|
-4.5
|
162
|
99
|
0
|
61.11%
|
|
-5
|
173
|
112
|
7
|
63.25%
|
|
-5.5
|
176
|
129
|
0
|
73.30%
|
|
-6
|
222
|
154
|
5
|
68.66%
|
|
-6.5
|
266
|
170
|
0
|
63.91%
|
|
-7
|
313
|
209
|
13
|
65.33%
|
|
-7.5
|
194
|
120
|
0
|
61.86%
|
|
-8
|
178
|
118
|
2
|
65.91%
|
|
-8.5
|
124
|
89
|
0
|
71.77%
|
|
-9
|
119
|
78
|
8
|
63.06%
|
|
-9.5
|
114
|
71
|
0
|
62.28%
|
|
-10
|
177
|
116
|
8
|
63.91%
|
|
-10.5
|
117
|
75
|
0
|
64.10%
|
|
-11
|
126
|
78
|
4
|
60.66%
|
|
-11.5
|
72
|
44
|
0
|
61.11%
|
|
-12
|
88
|
54
|
1
|
60.92%
|
|
-12.5
|
83
|
49
|
0
|
59.04%
|
|
-13
|
124
|
95
|
7
|
75.21%
|
|
-13.5
|
116
|
68
|
0
|
58.62%
|
|
-14
|
151
|
90
|
3
|
58.78%
|
|
-14.5
|
85
|
63
|
0
|
74.12%
|
|
-15
|
80
|
50
|
0
|
62.50%
|
|
6 Point Teasers: Road Underdogs
|
||||
|
Line
|
Games
|
6 Point Covers
|
6 Point Pushes
|
Cover Rate
|
|
0
|
94
|
67
|
3
|
70.33%
|
|
-1
|
277
|
193
|
11
|
68.42%
|
|
-1.5
|
181
|
135
|
0
|
74.59%
|
|
-2
|
234
|
166
|
6
|
70.18%
|
|
-2.5
|
312
|
219
|
0
|
70.19%
|
|
-3
|
434
|
306
|
19
|
69.16%
|
|
-3.5
|
356
|
221
|
0
|
62.08%
|
|
-4
|
279
|
203
|
5
|
72.26%
|
|
-4.5
|
216
|
150
|
0
|
69.44%
|
|
-5
|
215
|
147
|
4
|
67.77%
|
|
-5.5
|
213
|
139
|
0
|
65.26%
|
|
-6
|
294
|
186
|
1
|
63.14%
|
|
-6.5
|
346
|
227
|
0
|
65.61%
|
|
-7
|
459
|
294
|
8
|
63.41%
|
|
-7.5
|
268
|
165
|
0
|
61.57%
|
|
-8
|
249
|
160
|
5
|
63.52%
|
|
-8.5
|
188
|
120
|
0
|
63.83%
|
|
-9
|
233
|
154
|
15
|
63.76%
|
|
-9.5
|
178
|
108
|
0
|
60.67%
|
|
-10
|
303
|
187
|
6
|
60.94%
|
|
-10.5
|
198
|
136
|
0
|
68.69%
|
|
-11
|
206
|
141
|
3
|
67.98%
|
|
-11.5
|
131
|
90
|
0
|
68.70%
|
|
-12
|
194
|
143
|
6
|
72.87%
|
|
-12.5
|
174
|
105
|
0
|
60.34%
|
|
-13
|
263
|
176
|
9
|
65.75%
|
|
-13.5
|
231
|
140
|
0
|
60.61%
|
|
-14
|
313
|
182
|
3
|
57.74%
|
|
-14.5
|
208
|
130
|
0
|
62.50%
|
|
-15
|
194
|
131
|
5
|
66.67%
|
| ** | 70.71% | |||
| ** | +100 | |||
**The % at the bottom of the table are what are required to beat the juice in the next row. All odds highlighted that beat that number and thus would be profitable.
As you can see, there really aren’t a lot of good numbers for six point teasers in college football. With that being said, there are some logical patterns that do emerge. For example, home favorites of -7.5 and -8 teased to -1.5 or -2 have traditionally been a profitable bet. In this case you are taking a home team that is already favored and making it so that they only need to win by a field goal. Think about it, these teams already have home field advantage, plus the oddsmakers think they are worthy of being favored by more than a touchdown. Logic follows that they should win by at least a field goal, at least more often than not, which happens to be the case. You can use this information whenever you are wondering if the line you are teasing has been historically profitable or not in college football. Good luck!





Leave a Reply