Teasing College Football Road Underdogs

Posted by - Google+

Teasing College Football Road Underdogs

It’s becoming more and more common to bet teasers in college football, so I wanted to do some due diligence to see what the best odds are to tease.  I looked at every college football game from 1989 to 2011 and broke it down into different situations.  The table below shows only road underdogs, how many games landed on each spread, how many times a 6, 7, or 10 point tease would have resulted in a win or push, and the overall win rate for those teases.  I then compared the win rate to the required win rate needed to show a profit based on typical teaser odds.  I’ve highlighted the only consistent winning rate below for your convenience.  The 6 and 7 point teasers uses odds for two-team wagers, while the 10 point teaser is for three teams.

Line
Games
6 Point
6 Point Pushes
7 Point
7 Point Pushes
10 Point
10 Point Pushes
6 Point Win Rate
7 Point Win Rate
10 Point Win Rate
0
94 67 3 69 2 76 4 70.33% 72.83% 80.00%
-1
277 193 11 196 3 219 4 68.42% 70.44% 78.75%
-1.5
181 135 0 137 0 140 0 74.59% 75.69% 77.35%
-2
234 166 6 170 4 182 2 70.18% 72.17% 77.59%
-2.5
312 219 0 221 0 238 0 70.19% 70.83% 76.28%
-3
434 306 19 320 7 339 18 69.16% 73.30% 77.16%
-3.5
356 221 0 236 0 255 0 62.08% 66.29% 71.63%
-4
279 203 5 207 15 224 9 72.26% 72.73% 79.63%
-4.5
216 150 0 155 0 166 0 69.44% 71.76% 76.85%
-5
215 147 4 148 0 158 6 67.77% 68.84% 72.73%
-5.5
213 139 0 141 0 153 0 65.26% 66.20% 71.83%
-6
294 186 1 193 8 209 7 63.14% 64.69% 70.38%
-6.5
346 227 0 235 0 256 0 65.61% 67.92% 73.99%
-7
459 294 8 308 9 329 22 63.41% 66.44% 70.25%
-7.5
268 165 0 173 0 188 0 61.57% 64.55% 70.15%
-8
249 160 5 163 10 179 1 63.52% 64.02% 71.77%
-8.5
188 120 0 121 0 134 0 63.83% 64.36% 71.28%
-9
233 154 15 157 6 168 1 63.76% 66.52% 71.98%
-9.5
178 108 0 110 0 119 0 60.67% 61.80% 66.85%
-10
303 187 6 198 10 218 2 60.94% 64.16% 71.76%
-10.5
198 136 0 140 0 150 0 68.69% 70.71% 75.76%
-11
206 141 3 146 6 159 4 67.98% 70.00% 76.73%
-11.5
131 90 0 91 0 101 0 68.70% 69.47% 77.10%
-12
194 143 6 144 9 154 4 72.87% 72.97% 78.95%
-13
174 105 0 107 0 121 0 60.34% 61.49% 69.54%
-13
263 176 9 180 4 198 15 65.75% 67.95% 73.79%
-13.5
231 140 0 146 0 161 0 60.61% 63.20% 69.70%
-14
313 182 3 194 18 218 7 57.74% 59.66% 68.95%
-14.5
208 130 0 136 0 150 0 62.50% 65.38% 72.12%
-15
194 131 5 132 2 154 2 66.67% 67.71% 79.17%
70.71% 73.85% 81.70%
100 -120 -120

*The % at the bottom of the table are what are required to beat the juice in the next row.  All odds highlighted that beat that number and thus would be profitable.

As you can see from the data, there are only a few situations that have been consistent profitable for teasing road underdogs.   For example, teasing road underdogs of 1.5 points by 7 points has been profitable historically.  This makes sense because an underdog of only 1.5 points is most likely the better team, they just happen to be on the road.  Teasing them up to 8.5 points gets you past several key numbers (3,4 and 7) and makes it impossible to result in a push.  Maybe the most surprising information comes on 14-point road underdogs.  Teasing them from 14 to 20 or even 21 has resulted in the worst odds in this particular situation.  Apparently if a team is bad enough to be two touchdown underdogs, they are bad enough to lose by three touchdowns or more at a pretty consistent rate.  Be sure to check this table to see if you are getting good odds before you tease a road underdog in college football.

About the Author: Jimmy Boyd is known for his consistency. He's a proven winner in college and pro football, college and pro basketball and pro baseball. He finished as the No. 1 ranked MLB handicapper in 2007 by earning $1,000/game bettors $50,050. He also finished as the No. 1 ranked basketball handicapper in the 2008-09 season, profiting $1,000/game bettors 38,530. His basketball plays have banked $1,000/game bettors nearly $80,000 the last five years. Check out Jimmy's premium picks for tonight!
Connect with the author via: Twitter - Google+

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

HTML tags are not allowed.